Every movie contains a lesson in filmmaking, I think. And from Unstoppable I learned that a director should be relentless on an action script. Tony Scott wasn't precious about a single dramatic moment in that film (or at least he shot enough coverage to let others be relentless.) The film had plenty of melodrama. But it complimented the action, without competing for attention.
Because I love food metaphors, the emotional beats in the script were like butter on a steak. They added flavor, made the rich meal richer and gave the whole experience a touch of decadence (Denzel Washington's daughters work at Hooters? Oh my!) But a steak with butter is still a steak. A more precious director would have taken the melodrama in Unstoppable and turned it into a cream sauce. And while plenty of fine restaurants offer heavy sauces for their steaks, we question the judgment of those use take them. And by "we" I mean myself, the restaurant waiter, the chefs and steak-lovers everywhere.
Thank you Tony Scott for not slathering Unstoppable with hollandaise. But a slab of butter on top? Yes please.
Nice post. However, I found the emotional beats in "Unstoppable" to be more margarine than butter. For example, you could have removed Pine's character's emotional dilemma as well as Denzel's and the film wouldn't have been impacted all that much. I kept thinking, the train is so far away, just have someone call your loved ones and tell them to get outside the blast radius, but then the audience might think, "So, these guys risking their lives for a "train"? Which led me to feel the "emotional" beats were there to thwart that question and not so much as a true, compelling emotional dilemma that was driving these character's actions.
Another reason I never got the sense that either character had an emotional stake in saving their "loved ones", was because there was never a scene where we (the audience) could visually understand the relationships they were fighting for. There was a slight attempt with Pine's character watching his kid from afar get on the school bus, but I felt that was weak at best. To give an example of a film that I feel had solid action AND true emotional beats, is "Die Hard".
In "Die Hard" the scene between Mclaine and his wife at the beginning, for example, helps us to "see" the emotional dynamic Mclaine is fighting for. Also the way his wife reacts to the news of her husband's continued heroism, a mixture of knowing frustration and concern, shows us their relationship is deep (only those you deeply love can drive you crazy, even when they're trying to save your life). To me, that's the stuff Land-O-lakes is made of. On the contrary, Denzel's daughters are superficial and shallow, and Pine's wife and kid are...blonde, and not much else. I felt if they perhaps traded a few "train smashing into stuff" shots and replaced them with, "this is the love/life I'm fighting for" shots, there'd be more cream and less oil in the lubricating mixture.
What do you think?
And, on a side note, I watched "Saint John of Las Vegas" and enjoyed it very much. Thanks again for your blog. Looking forward to more of your thoughts.
-RTA
Posted by: RTA | Dec 06, 2010 at 02:53 PM
I agree. As far as action films go, Unstoppable was neither the tear-jerkiest nor the heart-thumpiest. So your margarine analogy may be both more accurate and more insightful. And Diehard (to play this out) didn't just have butter on it - it was buttery and delicious all the way through.
Thanks for watching Saint John. I appreciate it.
Posted by: Hue Rhodes | Dec 06, 2010 at 04:04 PM